N※N

Trump floats ''no tax on capital gains'' for home sales. Here''s who could benefit

Trump's Proposal to Eliminate Capital Gains Taxes on Home Sales: A Deep Dive into the Policy and Its Implications

In a bold move aimed at stimulating the housing market and appealing to middle-class voters, former President Donald Trump has proposed eliminating capital gains taxes on the sale of primary residences. This announcement, made during a recent campaign rally, underscores Trump's ongoing focus on tax cuts as a cornerstone of his economic agenda. The proposal comes at a time when the U.S. housing market is grappling with high interest rates, soaring home prices, and affordability challenges, making it a timely pitch to homeowners and potential buyers alike.

Trump's plan specifically targets the capital gains tax that homeowners currently pay on profits from selling their homes. Under existing federal tax law, individuals can exclude up to $250,000 in capital gains from the sale of a primary residence, while married couples filing jointly can exclude up to $500,000, provided they've lived in the home for at least two of the past five years. Any gains above these thresholds are subject to capital gains tax rates, which can range from 0% to 20% depending on income levels, plus an additional 3.8% net investment income tax for higher earners. Trump's proposal would do away with these taxes entirely for home sales, effectively allowing sellers to pocket the full profit without federal tax liability.

During his speech, Trump framed this as a "game-changer" for American families, arguing that it would encourage more people to sell their homes, thereby increasing housing supply and helping to drive down prices. "Why should the government take a cut when you're just trying to move up in life or downsize for retirement?" Trump rhetorically asked the crowd. He tied the idea to broader themes of reducing government overreach and putting more money back into the pockets of everyday Americans. This isn't the first time Trump has championed tax reforms; his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act significantly lowered corporate tax rates and adjusted individual brackets, though it faced criticism for disproportionately benefiting the wealthy.

The proposal arrives amid a sluggish housing market. Data from the National Association of Realtors indicates that existing home sales have plummeted to multi-decade lows, with median home prices hovering around $400,000 nationally. High mortgage rates, currently averaging over 7% for a 30-year fixed loan, have locked many homeowners into their low-rate mortgages from previous years, creating what's known as the "lock-in effect." This reluctance to sell exacerbates inventory shortages, pushing prices higher and sidelining first-time buyers. Trump's plan could theoretically break this cycle by incentivizing sales, as sellers would no longer worry about a hefty tax bill on their gains.

Experts have mixed reactions to the idea. Proponents, including some real estate industry leaders, argue that removing capital gains taxes on home sales would inject much-needed liquidity into the market. "This could be a catalyst for mobility," said Lawrence Yun, chief economist at the National Association of Realtors. "Homeowners who've been sitting on the sidelines might finally list their properties, which would help balance supply and demand." Supporters also point out that homes are often a family's largest asset, and taxing gains on them can feel punitive, especially in high-cost areas like California or New York where appreciation has been dramatic.

Critics, however, warn of potential downsides. Economists from progressive think tanks like the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities argue that the policy would primarily benefit wealthier households, who own more expensive homes and thus stand to gain the most from tax exemptions. "This is essentially a giveaway to the top earners," noted one analyst. "The average American might save a few thousand dollars, but million-dollar homeowners could pocket tens or hundreds of thousands tax-free." There's also concern about revenue loss for the federal government. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that capital gains from home sales generate billions in annual revenue, though exact figures vary. Eliminating this tax could widen the budget deficit, potentially forcing cuts to social programs or increases in other taxes.

Moreover, skeptics question whether the plan would truly boost affordability. While more sales might increase supply, it could also fuel speculation, driving prices even higher in hot markets. "Tax incentives like this often lead to bubbles," cautioned Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Analytics. "We've seen it before with various housing credits." Zandi referenced the 2008 financial crisis, where lax lending and tax perks contributed to a housing meltdown. Trump's proposal doesn't address underlying issues like zoning restrictions, construction costs, or interest rates, which are controlled by the Federal Reserve.

From a political standpoint, this fits into Trump's 2024 campaign strategy, now extending into 2025 discussions, where he's positioning himself as the champion of the working class against what he calls "Biden's inflationary policies." President Biden's administration has countered with its own housing initiatives, such as tax credits for first-time buyers and incentives for affordable housing development. Trump's idea could appeal to suburban voters in swing states like Pennsylvania and Michigan, where homeownership rates are high and economic anxieties run deep.

Delving deeper into the mechanics, implementing such a policy would require congressional approval, likely through legislation amending the Internal Revenue Code. Trump has hinted at bundling it with other tax cuts, such as extending the 2017 reforms set to expire in 2025. However, with a divided Congress, passage isn't guaranteed. Republicans might rally behind it as a pro-growth measure, while Democrats could decry it as regressive. Historical precedents exist; for instance, the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 introduced the current exclusion limits, which were seen as a compromise to encourage homeownership without fully eliminating the tax.

On the economic front, simulations from groups like the Tax Foundation suggest that eliminating capital gains on home sales could modestly boost GDP by encouraging investment in housing and related sectors like construction and real estate services. Home sales often trigger a ripple effect: sellers buy new homes, movers purchase furniture and appliances, and the overall economy gets a lift. Yet, this comes with trade-offs. The policy might discourage long-term homeownership if people flip properties more frequently to capture tax-free gains, potentially destabilizing neighborhoods.

Internationally, the U.S. isn't alone in taxing home sale profits. Countries like Canada and the UK have similar capital gains taxes on residences, though with exemptions. Australia's system, for example, exempts primary residences entirely, which some cite as a model for Trump's plan. Advocates argue that aligning U.S. policy with such models could make American housing more competitive globally, attracting foreign buyers or encouraging domestic investment.

For individual homeowners, the proposal's impact would vary. Consider a couple in Texas who bought a home for $300,000 a decade ago and now sell it for $600,000. Under current rules, they'd exclude $500,000 of the $300,000 gain, paying taxes on nothing. But if their gain was $600,000, they'd owe on $100,000. Trump's plan would erase that liability. In pricier markets like San Francisco, where homes appreciate rapidly, the savings could be enormous—potentially hundreds of thousands per sale.

Critics also highlight equity concerns. Renters, who don't benefit from homeownership tax perks, might feel further disadvantaged. This could widen the wealth gap, as homeownership is a key driver of intergenerational wealth, particularly for white families compared to communities of color, where homeownership rates lag.

Trump has not provided a detailed white paper on the proposal, leaving questions about specifics like whether it applies to second homes, investment properties, or only primary residences. He mentioned it would be "revenue neutral" through economic growth, a claim echoed in his past tax plans but often disputed by independent analyses.

In summary, Trump's push to eliminate capital gains taxes on home sales represents a significant policy gambit with the potential to reshape the housing landscape. While it promises relief for sellers and a boost to market activity, it raises thorny questions about fairness, fiscal responsibility, and long-term economic health. As the 2025 political season heats up, this idea will likely spark intense debate, pitting visions of tax relief against concerns of inequality. Whether it becomes law remains to be seen, but it's a clear signal of Trump's enduring commitment to deregulation and tax cuts as engines of prosperity. (Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full CNBC Article at:
[ https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/23/trump-no-capital-gains-taxes-home-sales.html ]