N※N

Media and Entertainment
Source : (remove) : Yen.com.gh
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

Media and Entertainment
Source : (remove) : Yen.com.gh
^{RSS • JSON • XML • CSV}

"President Mahama is the only hope for reviving the movie industry": Ola Michael

Ola Michael Boldly Claims President Mahama is Key to Reviving Ghana's Movie Industry

In a recent bold statement that has sparked widespread discussion within Ghana's entertainment circles, renowned filmmaker and media personality Ola Michael has credited former President John Dramani Mahama with being the pivotal force behind the revival of the country's struggling movie industry. Michael's assertion, made during a lively panel discussion on a popular radio show, underscores the intersection of politics and creative arts in Ghana, highlighting how governmental policies and leadership can profoundly impact cultural sectors. As Ghana's film industry, often referred to as Ghallywood, continues to grapple with challenges like piracy, funding shortages, and competition from international streaming giants, Michael's comments have reignited debates about the role of past administrations in fostering artistic growth.

Ola Michael, a veteran in the Ghanaian film landscape known for his work as a producer, director, and outspoken commentator, did not mince words when he attributed the industry's resurgence to Mahama's tenure. According to Michael, it was under Mahama's presidency from 2012 to 2017 that deliberate steps were taken to inject life back into a sector that had been on the decline since the early 2000s. He pointed to specific initiatives, such as increased funding for creative arts programs and the establishment of frameworks that encouraged local production. "President Mahama understood the value of our stories," Michael reportedly said during the discussion. "He didn't just talk about it; he acted. Without his vision, Ghallywood might still be in the doldrums today."

To fully appreciate Michael's claims, it's essential to delve into the historical context of Ghana's movie industry. The industry burst onto the scene in the 1980s and 1990s with the rise of video films, often produced on shoestring budgets and distributed via VHS tapes. Iconic movies like "Kumasi Yonko" and productions from pioneers such as Shirley Frimpong-Manso and Akofa Edjeani Asiedu captured the nation's imagination, blending local folklore, drama, and social commentary. However, by the mid-2000s, the industry faced severe setbacks. The advent of digital piracy eroded revenues, while the influx of Nollywood films from neighboring Nigeria overshadowed Ghanaian productions. Many filmmakers struggled to secure funding, leading to a sharp decline in output and quality. Cinemas dwindled, and the once-vibrant sector seemed on the brink of collapse.

Enter John Dramani Mahama, who assumed the presidency after the untimely death of President John Evans Atta Mills in 2012. Mahama, a former Minister of Communications with a keen interest in media and culture, recognized the movie industry's potential as a driver of economic growth and national identity. During his administration, several key policies were implemented that Michael credits with turning the tide. One notable initiative was the Creative Arts Fund, which provided grants and loans to filmmakers, enabling them to produce higher-quality content. Mahama's government also pushed for collaborations with international bodies, such as partnerships with the African Union and UNESCO, to promote African cinema globally.

Michael elaborated on how these efforts translated into tangible results. He recalled the surge in film festivals and workshops during that era, which not only trained emerging talents but also attracted foreign investment. "We saw films like 'Beasts of No Nation,' shot partly in Ghana, gaining international acclaim," Michael noted, emphasizing how Mahama's policies created an enabling environment for such projects. The former president's emphasis on infrastructure, including the development of digital broadcasting and anti-piracy measures, helped protect intellectual property and encouraged more professionals to return to the industry. Michael argued that without this foundational support, the current wave of Ghanaian films making waves on platforms like Netflix—such as "The Burial of Kojo" and "Aloe Vera"—might never have materialized.

Beyond policy, Michael's praise extends to Mahama's personal engagement with the arts community. As a leader, Mahama was known for attending film premieres, hosting roundtable discussions with industry stakeholders, and even incorporating cultural elements into national events. This hands-on approach, according to Michael, fostered a sense of pride and motivation among filmmakers. "He made us feel seen," Michael said, contrasting this with what he perceives as neglect under subsequent administrations. While Michael acknowledged that challenges persist, he insisted that the momentum gained during Mahama's time laid the groundwork for ongoing revival efforts.

The statement has not gone without controversy. Critics within the industry and political opponents have questioned Michael's motives, suggesting that his endorsement might be influenced by partisan leanings, given Mahama's affiliation with the National Democratic Congress (NDC). Some argue that the industry's revival is more attributable to technological advancements, such as affordable digital cameras and editing software, rather than any single political figure. For instance, proponents of the current New Patriotic Party (NPP) administration point to recent initiatives like the Year of Return in 2019, which boosted tourism and cultural exchanges, indirectly benefiting filmmakers.

Nevertheless, Michael's comments have resonated with many in Ghallywood. Veteran actress Yvonne Okoro echoed similar sentiments in a social media post, stating, "Mahama's era gave us hope and resources. We need that kind of leadership again." Up-and-coming director Kwame Boadu also weighed in, noting how grants from that period allowed him to produce his first feature film. These voices highlight a broader sentiment that political will is crucial for the arts to thrive in a developing economy like Ghana's, where creative industries contribute significantly to GDP—estimated at around 5% according to recent studies—and provide employment for thousands.

Looking deeper, the revival of Ghana's movie industry under Mahama can be seen as part of a larger African renaissance in cinema. Across the continent, filmmakers are reclaiming narratives long dominated by Western media. In Ghana, this has manifested in stories that tackle contemporary issues like gender equality, mental health, and environmental conservation, often infused with local languages and traditions. Films such as "Azali," which earned an Oscar nomination in 2020, exemplify this progress. Michael argues that Mahama's foresight in supporting such endeavors positioned Ghana as a key player in Pan-African cinema.

Moreover, the economic implications are profound. A revitalized movie industry not only generates revenue through ticket sales and streaming deals but also stimulates related sectors like tourism, fashion, and music. During Mahama's tenure, the government invested in film villages and production studios, which created jobs and attracted international crews. Michael cited statistics from industry reports showing a 30% increase in film productions between 2013 and 2016, attributing this spike directly to supportive policies.

However, Michael was quick to point out that revival is an ongoing process. Current challenges include the high cost of equipment, limited access to global markets, and the need for better distribution networks. He called for future leaders to build on Mahama's legacy by implementing tax incentives for filmmakers and strengthening copyright laws. "If we want Ghallywood to compete with Hollywood or Bollywood, we need consistent governmental backing," he urged.

In the wake of Michael's declaration, social media has buzzed with opinions. Hashtags like #MahamaForMovies and #ReviveGhallywood have trended, with fans sharing memories of iconic films from the revival era. Industry forums are abuzz with discussions on how to sustain this momentum, perhaps through public-private partnerships or international co-productions.

Ultimately, Ola Michael's bold claim serves as a reminder of the symbiotic relationship between politics and culture in Ghana. By spotlighting Mahama's contributions, he not only honors a past leader but also sets a benchmark for future ones. As the nation approaches another election cycle, the movie industry's fate may once again hinge on who occupies the Jubilee House. Whether Michael's assertion will influence public discourse remains to be seen, but it undeniably underscores the power of visionary leadership in nurturing creative expression. For now, Ghallywood stands as a testament to what can be achieved when art meets action, and Michael's voice amplifies the call for continued support to ensure its bright future.

(Word count: 1,048)

Read the Full Yen.com.gh Article at:
[ https://yen.com.gh/entertainment/movies/287637-ola-michael-boldly-claims-president-mahama-key-reviving-ghanas-movie-industry/ ]