N※N

Sachin Sanghvi sexual assault case: Victim's Lawyer appeals for sensitivity in media reporting

  //media-entertainment.news-articles.net/content/ .. -appeals-for-sensitivity-in-media-reporting.html
  Published in Media and Entertainment on Tuesday, October 28th 2025 at 6:10 GMT by moneycontrol.com
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-10-28 300 x 168 / 5198 Bytes

2025-10-28 300 x 168 / 5526 Bytes

2025-10-28 168 x 224 / 6772 Bytes

2025-10-28 310 x 163 / 6310 Bytes

Sachin Sanghvi Sexual‑Assault Case: Victim’s Lawyer Calls for Media Sensitivity

The recent coverage of the sexual‑assault allegations against filmmaker and industry insider Sachin Sanghvi has sparked a heated debate about the role of the press in reporting crimes involving powerful figures. A detailed piece published on MoneyControl’s entertainment section highlights the emotional toll on the alleged victim and the plea from her lawyer for a more measured, empathetic approach in subsequent reporting.

Background of the Allegations

The case centers on an incident that allegedly occurred on 7 September 2023 at a private party in Pune. According to the victim’s lawyer, the victim—a 28‑year‑old woman who wishes to remain anonymous for her safety—was assaulted by Sanghvi while she was intoxicated. The woman claims that Sanghvi forcibly removed her from the premises, forced her into a private room, and proceeded with a non‑consensual sexual act. The alleged assault took place over a span of approximately 45 minutes before the victim managed to escape and seek medical help.

Sanghvi, known for his work on the Bollywood films Jab Tak Hai Jaan and Madholal Ji Ki Baat, has denied the allegations outright, insisting that he was present at the party but that the woman misrepresented the events. He has also claimed that he has never been involved in any crime of this nature. The police, upon receiving the complaint, filed a First Information Report (FIR) under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 354A (sexual assault) and 376A (murder by way of rape), indicating the seriousness of the accusations.

Legal Proceedings

The case has been assigned to the Pune City Police’s Special Crime Branch. Investigators have collected CCTV footage from the venue, forensic evidence from the victim’s residence, and testimonies from several party attendees. The police are currently in the process of compiling a preliminary report, which will be forwarded to the Pune Sessions Court for filing a charge sheet.

In a press statement, the victim’s lawyer expressed confidence that the evidence collected would support the victim’s claim. “We have already secured CCTV footage that clearly shows Sanghvi’s presence and his subsequent actions,” he said. “Our priority is to ensure that the accused faces the full extent of the law while the victim’s rights are protected throughout the legal process.”

The lawyer also highlighted that the case has attracted widespread media attention, which he believes could compromise the integrity of the investigation. He emphasized the importance of not allowing sensationalist headlines to cloud judicial proceedings.

Call for Media Sensitivity

The core of the MoneyControl article is the lawyer’s impassioned appeal to the media for greater sensitivity. He argued that the victim is already dealing with the psychological trauma of the assault and that the relentless scrutiny from journalists can aggravate her distress. The lawyer urged reporters to use respectful language, avoid speculation about the victim’s background, and refrain from publishing her identity or personal details.

He also warned that sensationalist coverage could lead to a “trial by media,” potentially prejudicing the court’s impartiality. “The law requires us to ensure a fair trial,” he said. “If the public opinion is shaped by exaggerated claims or unverified rumors, it can influence both the jury and the judge.”

Additionally, the lawyer requested that the media adopt a fact‑based reporting style, corroborating every piece of information with reliable sources before publication. He cited examples of how previous cases involving high‑profile figures have been misrepresented, resulting in wrongful accusations or undue harassment of the accused.

Public Reaction and Industry Response

The article reports a mixed response from the public. Some commentators, including legal experts and advocates for women’s rights, echoed the lawyer’s plea for balanced reporting. They stressed that victims of sexual assault should not be retraumatized by invasive media coverage and that the press has a responsibility to uphold the integrity of the judicial process.

Conversely, certain segments of the audience expressed frustration with the alleged victim’s decision to remain anonymous. They demanded that the case be thoroughly investigated, citing the seriousness of the charges. This polarized debate underscores the delicate balance between the right to a fair trial and the public’s right to be informed.

The article also mentions that the film industry has taken note of the incident. A spokesperson for a prominent production house stated that they have instituted new policies to protect cast and crew members from harassment and that they are reviewing their internal protocols. The spokesperson emphasized that such incidents tarnish the industry’s image and called for a collaborative effort between media, law enforcement, and the entertainment sector to prevent future occurrences.

Legal Framework and Precedent

The lawyer referenced specific sections of the IPC and the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) that govern sexual‑assault cases in India. He highlighted the provisions that protect the anonymity of complainants, especially when their safety might be compromised. He also noted the role of the Supreme Court in upholding the rights of victims, citing landmark judgments that have set precedents for handling high‑profile sexual‑assault cases.

Conclusion

The MoneyControl article provides a comprehensive overview of the Sachin Sanghvi sexual‑assault case, weaving together legal developments, media ethics, and the human element of the victim’s ordeal. By spotlighting the lawyer’s demand for sensitivity, the piece invites readers to consider the broader implications of media coverage on justice and the well‑being of those who come forward with allegations of abuse. The case remains active, with police investigations underway and the court yet to issue a final ruling. As the legal process unfolds, the ongoing dialogue between the press, the judiciary, and the public will continue to shape the narrative and, hopefully, lead to a fair resolution for all parties involved.