Media and Entertainment Media and Entertainment
Fri, January 10, 2025
[ 03:44 PM ] - MSN
Sci-fi series hailed as 'better than Black Mirror .. lly available to stream eight years on from debut
[ 03:44 PM ] - MSN
Saba Azad's romantic tribute to Hrithik Roshan on his 51st birthday
[ 03:04 PM ] - Newsweek
Why David Muir is Being Criticized for His So-Called 'Narcissism' Amid L.A. Fires
[ 02:44 PM ] - MSN
Animated Sequels Are Back, Led by Disney's 'Zootopia 2,' but Pixar Counters with Original 'Elio'
[ 02:44 PM ] - Newsweek
Why Kim Kardashian Is Getting Slammed for 'Tone Deaf' Post Amid L.A. Wildfires
[ 01:44 PM ] - Yahoo
Chuck D Slams Misuse of Public Enemy's 'Burn Hollywood Burn' Amid LA Wildfires
[ 01:24 PM ] - BBC
BBC Comedy unveils star-studded cast of Amandaland
[ 01:04 PM ] - MSN
New details emerge about the supposed romance between Aitana and Jude Bellingham
[ 12:44 PM ] - MSN
Who Is RJ Mahvash? Everything About Actor-Film Producer Linked To Yuzvendra Chahal
[ 12:44 PM ] - MSN
JoJo Siwa slammed for 'tone deaf' video as she rescues her clothes amid horror Los Angeles fires
[ 12:44 PM ] - Tuko
Emotional Moment as Rachel Otuoma Lies on Hubby's Casket after Mass
[ 12:44 PM ] - Reuters
Former WWE CEO Vince McMahon settles with SEC over undisclosed settlements with women
[ 12:24 PM ] - MSN
Ajith's Vidaamuyarchi Clears Censorship Formalities With U/A Certificate
[ 12:24 PM ] - Investopedia
The 5 Biggest Mergers in History
[ 11:44 AM ] - Forbes
Sony/Honda 'Afeela' EV Collaboration Gets Production Timetable And Pricing
[ 11:24 AM ] - MSN
The Most Controversial Movies Ever, According to Letterboxd
[ 11:24 AM ] - MSN
Nintendo Switch 2: Everything we know so far
[ 11:04 AM ] - MSN
All the celebrities impacted by the Los Angeles fires: Paris Hilton, Miles Teller and more
[ 11:04 AM ] - MSN
Who is Muskan Nancy James? TV actress previously .. for domestic violence against her former in-laws
[ 11:04 AM ] - MSN
Sport and live events dominate list as Ireland's most watched TV programmes for 2024 revealed
[ 11:04 AM ] - AOL
Supreme Court to hear arguments over the fate of TikTok on Friday
[ 10:24 AM ] - Yahoo
Cincinnati's Top Content Creators of 2025: Nominate your favorite social media stars
[ 09:44 AM ] - MSN
NBA star Jimmy Butler slams 'unemployed' baby mama for demanding extra $10k a month
[ 09:44 AM ] - MSN
Ogie Alcasid's FB page at profile, na-hack; Star Music, naglabas ng pahayag ukol sa isyu
[ 09:44 AM ] - MSN
Travis Kelce's ex-girlfriend Kayla Nicole does no .. lor Swift amid facing significant online backlash
[ 08:44 AM ] - MSN
Marian Rivera, ipinasilip ang "family time" nila sa Dubai
[ 08:44 AM ] - MSN
Alia Bhatt also likes a good discount and her latest post is proof
[ 08:44 AM ] - Tuko
Gatundu Boy Who Almost Gave up Due to Poverty Scores B- in KCSE: "Glory to God"
[ 08:44 AM ] - MSN
Unique downtown Wilmington food and entertainment venue to close
[ 08:24 AM ] - pinkvilla
Song Hye Kyo, Jeon Yeo Been become bruised and ba .. e fight against evil spirits in Dark Nuns; PHOTOS

Supreme Court to hear arguments over the fate of TikTok on Friday


Published on 2025-01-10 11:04:08 - AOL
  Print publication without navigation

  • TikTok threatened to shut down the popular platform in America on Jan. 19 unless the Supreme Court strikes down or otherwise delays the effective date of a law aimed at forcing TikTok's sale by its Chinese parent company.

The Supreme Court is set to hear arguments in a case involving a trademark dispute between Jack Daniel's and VIP Products, the maker of a dog toy that mimics the iconic whiskey bottle. The toy, called "Bad Spaniels," parodies Jack Daniel's branding with humorous, dog-related alterations. Jack Daniel's argues that the toy infringes on their trademark, potentially confusing consumers and diluting their brand's distinctiveness. Conversely, VIP Products contends that their product is a parody protected under the First Amendment. This case could have significant implications for how trademark law intersects with free speech rights, particularly in the realm of parody and satire.

Read the Full AOL Article at:
[ https://www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-hear-arguments-over-100045789.html ]
Contributing Sources