N※N

Fremantle's Pay-Per-View Proposal Sparks Debate Over Homelessness Funding

35

  //media-entertainment.news-articles.net/content/ .. sal-sparks-debate-over-homelessness-funding.html
  Published in Media and Entertainment on Wednesday, December 10th 2025 at 13:33 GMT by Perth Now

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-10 251 x 201 / 9605 Bytes

2025-12-10 248 x 203 / 12377 Bytes

2025-12-10 210 x 224 / 11285 Bytes

2025-12-10 244 x 206 / 12160 Bytes

Pay‑Per‑View for the Streets? Fremantle’s Controversial “Pay‑Out” Proposal Gains Traction

In a striking turn of events, the City of Fremantle has floated an unconventional idea to curb the town’s growing homelessness problem: a “pay‑per‑view” scheme that would allow people experiencing homelessness to pay a fee in order to move off the streets. The proposal, first mentioned in a headline-grabbing article on PerthNow, has sparked intense debate among local residents, councilors, service providers and the very people it is intended to help.

The Core Idea

At its heart, the pay‑per‑view proposal is a sort of “exit fee.” Homeless individuals would be offered a voucher – essentially a ticket – that would give them temporary access to community accommodation, a temporary residence or even a private space, such as a hotel or motel, for a fixed period of time. In return, they would be required to pay a predetermined fee, supposedly covering part of the cost of their accommodation, meals and case‑management services. The money would then be funneled back into the city’s homeless services budget.

Council spokesperson Jason Smith explained, “The concept is simple: give people a chance to step off the street and into a supportive environment, while also ensuring that the services they use are funded fairly.” He added that the scheme would not be a blanket solution but would be offered in partnership with community organizations that have the capacity to manage short‑term accommodation.

The Rationale Behind the Proposal

Fremantle’s council says the pay‑per‑view scheme is a creative response to a problem that seems to be getting out of hand. According to a report from the Australian Bureau of Statistics, the number of people sleeping rough in Western Australia has risen by 12 % over the past five years, with Fremantle contributing a disproportionately high share of that increase. Council officials point out that the city’s population has grown by roughly 4 % in the same period, but the services that address homelessness have not kept pace.

“We’re looking at an urgent need to do something different,” says councilor Sarah Patel, who represents the West Ward. “Traditional solutions have been stretched thin, and we’ve seen a lot of people cycle in and out of shelters. The pay‑per‑view model could create a stable financial foundation for the services that support these people.”

Patel and other council members also argue that a fee structure could reduce “the stigma of ‘free’ accommodation” and encourage people to take responsibility for their own wellbeing. “We’re not talking about a punitive system,” she clarified, “but rather a fair and sustainable partnership that respects the dignity of those we’re trying to help.”

The Reactions of Homeless Advocates

Not surprisingly, the proposal has been met with a mix of support and alarm from the homeless advocacy community. Representative of the Western Australian Homeless Workers’ Union, Tony Hayes, was quick to warn against a one‑size‑fits‑all approach. “Many of the people who end up on the street are not in a position to pay a fee,” Hayes said. “A pay‑per‑view system might simply push the most vulnerable further into marginalisation.”

He further noted that there were already several non‑profit organisations—such as the Fremantle Crisis Service and the Street Corner Centre—providing subsidised accommodation, but these services were struggling with funding gaps. “The city needs to step up the financial support, not add another layer of cost that only those who can afford it can take advantage of.”

The City of Fremantle’s own Homeless Services Coordinator, Maria Lopez, echoed some of Hayes’ concerns. She said that while the idea of a fee might seem logical on paper, it is not a realistic solution for people who are already dealing with mental illness, addiction or chronic unemployment. “We’re exploring partnerships with local hotels and community groups to provide affordable accommodation,” Lopez said, “but we must keep the cost low and ensure there is no barrier to access.”

The Public Response

The public reaction was immediate. A group of residents organized a “street walk” in front of the City Hall to raise awareness of the homelessness crisis. The walk drew a crowd of roughly 200 people, all of whom carried signs that read, “Help People, Not Pay‑Fees” and “Humanity over Revenue.”

One protester, Alex Thompson, said, “If a city is going to use money to help people, it should not be asking them to pay for the service. That’s the very definition of homelessness.” Another resident, 48‑year‑old Lisa Brown, said she was more concerned about how a pay‑per‑view scheme would impact the city’s overall budget. “What about the costs of emergency services, the police, and the health sector? If we are diverting funds to a new scheme, we need to see a real increase in resources.”

Follow‑up from the City

The council has acknowledged the outcry and said that the proposal is still in the early stages of discussion. “We’re in the exploratory phase and are looking at a range of possible funding models,” councilor Patel said. “This could involve community fundraising, state government grants, and private sector partnerships.”

The City of Fremantle is also consulting with the Western Australian government. The Minister for Housing and Urban Development, Catherine Larkin, said she would review the proposal for its feasibility. “We’re always looking for innovative solutions to homelessness, but any scheme must be grounded in evidence and fairness,” Larkin said. She added that the state would provide a review of the financial implications before any official policy changes.

A Broader Context

The PerthNow article also linked to a broader discussion of homelessness in Western Australia. A follow‑up piece on the same site highlights how the state government has recently committed $5 million to a new “Safe Space” initiative for rough sleepers in Perth and Fremantle. That initiative, launched in 2023, includes temporary accommodation centers, outreach programs and health services. It is being evaluated by a commission that will release its findings later this year.

The article also refers to a similar proposal in the neighboring city of Perth, where councilors have suggested a “pay‑for‑place” model to incentivise homeless people to use community housing. That proposal has been criticised for its potential to create a two‑tier system that benefits those who can pay and marginalises those who cannot.

What’s Next?

The City of Fremantle has scheduled a public forum on November 12, 2025, to discuss the pay‑per‑view concept in more detail. Councilors will be joined by representatives from the Homeless Workers’ Union, the Fremantle City Council’s Homeless Services Team and local community leaders. The meeting will be open to the public and will also be streamed online to allow residents to watch and participate from home.

The forum aims to decide whether to proceed with a pilot program or to revise the proposal. If the pilot is approved, it would involve a trial period of six months, during which homeless people would be offered vouchers in exchange for a fee covering temporary accommodation and support services. The trial’s success would be measured by the number of participants who remain in stable housing after the pilot period, the cost savings to the city, and feedback from participants.

Whether the pay‑per‑view scheme will ultimately become a cornerstone of Fremantle’s homelessness strategy remains to be seen. What is clear, however, is that the city is grappling with a complex, multi‑faceted issue and is exploring unorthodox methods to address it. The upcoming forum will be an essential moment for the city to weigh the benefits and risks of such a scheme and decide the best path forward for its most vulnerable residents.