N※N

MAGA Influencers Urge Trump to Cancel Netflix Deal Over Alleged Obama Ties

  //media-entertainment.news-articles.net/content/ .. cancel-netflix-deal-over-alleged-obama-ties.html
  Published in Media and Entertainment on Tuesday, December 9th 2025 at 15:42 GMT by Seattle Times

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-09 224 x 224 / 13493 Bytes

2025-12-09 183 x 224 / 9954 Bytes

2025-11-03 224 x 224 / 8007 Bytes

2025-12-09 224 x 224 / 6602 Bytes

MAGA Influencers Call on Trump to Cancel Netflix‑Streaming Deal Because of “Obama Ties”

In a surprising political skirmish that turned the streaming wars into a partisan front, a group of right‑wing “MAGA” influencers is urging former President Donald J. Trump to intervene in a Netflix distribution agreement they claim is tied to former President Barack Obama. The call was made public on a livestreamed event hosted by a coalition of social‑media personalities, ex‑campaign staffers, and local politicians, all of whom argue that the partnership will give Obama‑affiliated content a mainstream platform and thereby undermine conservative values.

The Deal in Question

According to the influencers, Netflix has entered into a multi‑year, multi‑platform streaming contract with a service that is “deeply connected” to the Obama Foundation. While the official announcement from Netflix is vague—simply noting “a new partnership that expands content availability across a network of streaming outlets”—the MAGA coalition claims the deal is with “the streaming service operated by the Obama Foundation, which is financed by donors linked to the former president.”

The partnership is reported to cover several key elements:

1. Exclusive Streaming Rights – A slate of documentary‑style programs, many of which highlight Obama’s presidency, the Foundation’s philanthropic initiatives, and progressive social policy.
2. Revenue Sharing – The streaming service would receive a significant share of subscription and advertising revenue generated by the content on Netflix’s platform.
3. Joint Marketing – Co‑branded promotional material that would highlight the Foundation’s projects to a wider audience.

While the official Netflix statement only describes the deal as a “strategic partnership” aimed at “broadening the accessibility of high‑quality content,” the MAGA influencers insist the underlying motive is to disseminate Obama‑centric narratives that they say “reframe American history in a progressive light.”

Why Trump Should Intervene?

The coalition’s rally featured several high‑profile ex‑Trump allies—such as a former communications director, a state‑level GOP activist, and a controversial political commentator who has a following of over a million on Twitter. They all make the case that Trump, as a charismatic leader who has historically “cut deals” to shape public policy, is uniquely positioned to put pressure on both Netflix and the streaming service.

“This isn’t just about a streaming platform,” said the commentator, “this is about preserving the narrative of our nation. If we allow the Obama Foundation to use Netflix’s reach, we’re giving a progressive narrative an enormous platform.”

They argue that, given Trump’s influence over the Republican establishment and his reputation for disrupting mainstream media, he could either threaten legal action or use his platform to rally public opposition to the partnership. They also note that Trump has historically leveraged his media relationships to “swing deals” in his favor, suggesting that a similar move could be made to curb the partnership.

The Broader Context

The streaming industry is in the midst of an intense period of consolidation. Netflix, the world’s largest subscription‑streaming service, has been aggressively partnering with or acquiring competing platforms to ensure it remains the dominant distribution channel. The current partnership, if confirmed, would be part of that trend—bringing an otherwise niche content provider into Netflix’s global distribution network.

At the same time, the political landscape has increasingly seen media be a battleground. The MAGA coalition’s call echoes earlier attempts to “cancel” media outlets they deem “fake news” or “left‑leaning.” A recent example was the coalition’s push for the closure of a local investigative news site, citing “political bias.” This latest call against Netflix highlights the growing entanglement of streaming platforms with politics.

Response from Netflix

Netflix’s public relations team has issued a statement clarifying that the partnership “does not carry any political affiliation.” The company stresses that its decisions are driven solely by “content strategy and consumer demand.” While no details have been released about the exact identity of the streaming partner, executives have warned that any partnership that could jeopardize the brand’s broad audience will be re‑evaluated.

“We are committed to providing a diverse range of stories that reflect the many perspectives of the world,” a spokesperson said. “Our focus remains on delivering high‑quality content to our subscribers.”

Possible Implications

If Trump takes up the call and attempts to influence the partnership, the outcome could range from a public “debate” that forces Netflix to postpone or renegotiate the deal, to a more subtle influence where the streaming service is pressured to distance itself from the Foundation’s involvement. It could also spark a backlash from the streaming community, who see such interference as an infringement on creative freedom.

At a more strategic level, the partnership may actually help Netflix solidify its position against other streaming giants like Disney+, Amazon Prime Video, and HBO Max, by adding unique, high‑profile content that has a built‑in audience. The MAGA coalition’s opposition could backfire if the public perceives the move as politically motivated and out of step with Netflix’s brand ethos of diversity and inclusiveness.

Bottom Line

The call to “kill” a Netflix‑streaming deal because of its ties to Barack Obama is a clear manifestation of the current political climate, where media distribution and political narratives are often seen as interchangeable. Whether former President Trump will act remains uncertain. Still, the incident underscores the ongoing clash between streaming platforms, which seek to broaden their content catalogues, and a segment of the political right that views such expansions as a threat to the ideological status quo.