N※N

Khammam Eviction Drive: Congress Leader Accuses Government of 'Manufactured Consent'

  //media-entertainment.news-articles.net/content/ .. -accuses-government-of-manufactured-consent.html
  Published in Media and Entertainment on Thursday, February 26th 2026 at 13:21 GMT by Telangana Today
      Locale: Telangana, INDIA

Khammam, Telangana - February 26th, 2026 - Allegations of manufactured consent are swirling around the ongoing eviction drive in Khammam district, with prominent Congress leader Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy publicly accusing the state government of utilizing paid protestors to create a facade of public support for the controversial land acquisitions. The claims come amidst escalating tensions and growing distress among families displaced by projects including the Kothagudem-Yellandu Road widening and a crucial pumping station for the Godavari-Vaigai link canal project.

Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Reddy raised pointed questions about the timing and origins of the pro-government demonstrations. He highlighted the conspicuous absence of these same voices during the initial planning phases of the projects, suggesting a deliberate attempt to manipulate public perception after the eviction orders were issued. "Where were these supporters when the projects were initially conceived? Why have they suddenly materialized now, during the most sensitive stage - the eviction drive?" Reddy asked, fueling speculation of a coordinated effort to quell dissent.

The allegations center around the perceived artificiality of the pro-government protests, suggesting they are not organic expressions of popular support but rather a calculated attempt to deflect criticism and obscure the human cost of the development projects. Reddy's statements imply that financial incentives are being offered to individuals to participate in demonstrations, creating a distorted picture of genuine public sentiment.

The Context: Development Versus Displacement

The current crisis stems from the state government's push to modernize infrastructure in the Khammam district. The Kothagudem-Yellandu Road widening project aims to improve connectivity and facilitate economic growth, while the Godavari-Vaigai link canal project - a significant undertaking connecting two major river systems - promises to address water scarcity issues in the region. However, these ambitious projects require substantial land acquisition, inevitably leading to the displacement of numerous families and the disruption of established livelihoods.

Local sources indicate that the eviction process has been particularly fraught, with accusations of inadequate compensation, lack of transparent communication, and insufficient resettlement plans. Affected families report losing not only their homes but also their farms, businesses, and access to essential resources. This has led to spontaneous protests, often met with police intervention and further exacerbating tensions.

A Pattern of Managed Dissent?

Reddy's accusations aren't occurring in a vacuum. Political analysts suggest that the alleged tactic of employing paid protestors is becoming increasingly common across India, particularly in regions experiencing rapid development and large-scale infrastructure projects. Critics argue that this practice undermines genuine democratic expression and prevents legitimate grievances from being addressed.

"We've seen this playbook before," explains Dr. Aruna Patel, a political science professor at Hyderabad University, specializing in social movements. "Governments, especially those pushing through unpopular policies, often resort to creating a parallel narrative of support. Using paid protestors allows them to control the optics, drown out dissenting voices, and portray a sense of consensus where none exists."

The key challenge, according to Dr. Patel, is discerning authentic public opinion from orchestrated displays. "It's becoming increasingly difficult for the media and the public to differentiate between genuine grassroots movements and astroturfing - the practice of creating a false impression of widespread support."

Government Response and Future Implications The state government has yet to officially respond to Ponguleti Srinivas Reddy's allegations. However, sources within the ruling party dismiss the claims as politically motivated and designed to discredit the administration. They maintain that the eviction drive is being conducted in accordance with legal procedures and with due consideration for the welfare of affected families.

The coming weeks will be crucial in determining the future of the displaced communities and the credibility of the development projects. Independent investigations into the allegations of paid protests are likely to be demanded. The situation in Khammam underscores the critical need for transparent land acquisition policies, fair compensation, and robust resettlement programs to ensure that development doesn't come at the expense of vulnerable populations. Without addressing these concerns, the potential for continued unrest and erosion of public trust remains high.