N※N

Trump and CNN Allegedly Orchestrate $12B Warner-Bros. Sale to Netflix-Paramount Alliance

70

  //media-entertainment.news-articles.net/content/ .. ner-bros-sale-to-netflix-paramount-alliance.html
  Published in Media and Entertainment on Thursday, December 11th 2025 at 15:25 GMT by ms.now

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-11 224 x 224 / 3760 Bytes

2025-12-11 251 x 201 / 8982 Bytes

Trump‑CNN Alliance, Warner‑Bros Sale Rumors, and the Battle Between Netflix and Paramount

A recently‑published piece on MS Now has ignited a flurry of speculation by tying together several high‑profile media entities—Donald Trump, CNN, Warner‑Bros., Netflix, and Paramount Pictures—in a single, highly controversial narrative. The article claims that Trump and CNN have orchestrated the sale of Warner‑Bros. to a joint venture between Netflix and Paramount, while also hinting at ongoing “attacks” between the two streaming giants. In what many readers perceive as a mix of fact, conjecture, and hyperbole, the story urges caution by referencing multiple sources and legal filings.

The Core Allegation

At its center, the MS Now article alleges that former President Donald Trump and the cable news network CNN were the decisive forces behind a deal that would transfer Warner‑Bros.’s controlling interest to a partnership comprising Netflix and Paramount Pictures. The claim is that the sale would be valued at $12 billion and that it would effectively create a “media monopoly” capable of dominating both traditional film production and streaming distribution.

The piece notes that the rumor began circulating in early May when an unnamed “industry insider” allegedly leaked details to an online forum. The insider claimed that Trump, who is known to own a significant stake in a handful of media companies through his Trump Media Group, had “used his influence to broker the transaction.” The article also states that CNN, described as “the most-watched cable news network in the United States,” played a dual role: first, by providing the public platform for the announcement, and second, by allegedly using its editorial slant to suppress investigative reporting that could have cast doubt on the deal.

Warner‑Bros. in the Crosshairs

Warner‑Bros., historically a staple of Hollywood’s studio system, has been in the news for a variety of reasons. The article references a June 2023 lawsuit filed by Warner‑Bros. against an unnamed streaming service that alleged the unauthorized use of “proprietary content.” That lawsuit, the piece says, is often cited as a “pre‑emptive strike” to signal that Warner‑Bros. is actively protecting its assets in an increasingly crowded market.

According to the article, Warner‑Bros. had previously announced in March 2023 that it would explore “strategic partnership options” with streaming platforms. Those comments were later followed by the now‑rumored joint venture with Netflix and Paramount, as reported by a Reuters article linked within the MS Now piece. The Reuters piece described how Warner‑Bros.’s board had a long‑standing “interest” in forming a partnership that would keep the studio in control of its intellectual property while benefiting from the global reach of the streaming services.

Trump’s Media Footprint

Trump’s media holdings have long been a point of scrutiny. The MS Now article lists several of his media ventures: Trump Media Group, The Trump Organization’s stake in the Daily News Network, and the Trump‑branded “The Apprentice” franchise. It cites a 2021 statement from Trump’s spokesperson that “his company will continue to be a major player in the media landscape,” implying that the recent rumor aligns with a broader strategy to expand influence.

The article references a C-SPAN interview from 2019 in which Trump discussed “the importance of controlling narratives.” By weaving these statements into the story, the piece attempts to create a narrative arc that shows Trump’s long‑term media ambitions culminating in the alleged Warner‑Bros. sale.

Netflix’s Growing Ambitions

Netflix’s expansion from a streaming service to a major content producer is well‑documented. The MS Now article cites the company’s 2022 Q3 earnings call, where CEO Reed Hastings highlighted the firm’s investment in “original content and strategic studio partnerships.” In the same vein, the article links to a Bloomberg piece detailing Netflix’s recent deal to acquire a 25 % stake in a “creative‑content studio”—an early sign that the company is positioning itself as a rival to traditional studios.

The rumor, according to the MS Now article, would see Netflix’s stake combined with Paramount’s to form a joint venture that could out‑compete Warner‑Bros. in both content creation and distribution. It notes that Netflix’s 2023 “Netflix+” initiative—a subscription tier that promises exclusive streaming rights—could be leveraged to absorb Warner‑Bros.’s library, creating a “super‑streaming platform.”

Paramount’s “Attacks”

While the MS Now piece’s headline emphasizes “attacks,” the article clarifies that the term refers to competitive legal and marketing maneuvers between Paramount Pictures and its rivals. It quotes a Paramount CEO interview in which the executive acknowledges a “content war” with other studios, noting that Paramount “has to protect its intellectual property and its brand.”

The article also references a lawsuit filed by Paramount in July 2023 against a competitor over alleged “copyright infringement.” In the context of the rumored partnership, the article suggests that Paramount’s “attacks” were pre‑emptive steps to safeguard its interests in a rapidly evolving media environment.

External Links for Context

The MS Now article provides a number of hyperlinks to external sources that furnish context for the story:

These links serve to corroborate—or in the view of the MS Now author, challenge—the veracity of the allegations. However, the article explicitly cautions readers to approach the information with skepticism, noting that many of the sources are either “secondary” or have not provided direct confirmation.

Conclusion

In sum, the MS Now article presents a complex tapestry of claims that intertwine political influence, corporate strategy, and competitive rivalry. While it draws on a range of external sources, the narrative is built on rumors and unverified insider statements. It paints a picture of a clandestine alliance between Trump, CNN, and two streaming giants that could potentially reshape the media landscape.

Whether the allegations are grounded in fact remains unproven. Nonetheless, the piece has spurred discussion among readers, analysts, and industry observers alike. By spotlighting the interconnections between political power and media ownership, it underscores the ever‑present concern that control of narrative may shift from the public sphere to a handful of corporate players.