N※N

Houston Congresswoman Dan Crenshaw weighs in on the government shutdown | Houston Public Media

  //media-entertainment.news-articles.net/content/ .. he-government-shutdown-houston-public-media.html
  Published in Media and Entertainment on Friday, October 3rd 2025 at 14:57 GMT by Houston Public Media
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Congresswoman Dan Crenshaw Calls for a Bipartisan Fix to the Federal Shutdown—A Houston Matters Summary

In a recent episode of Houston Matters, Houston Public Media’s flagship public‑radio program, Congresswoman Dan Crenshaw—representing Texas’s 2nd congressional district and a former Navy SEAL—took a hard‑line stance on the looming federal government shutdown that threatens to end mid‑October. The interview, aired on October 3, 2025, offers a clear view into how a seasoned veteran‑turned‑lawmaker interprets the crisis, why he sees it as a threat to national security, and what he believes should happen next.

The Current Standoff

The episode opens with a quick recap of the budget impasse. As the House and Senate fail to agree on a fiscal year plan, the U.S. federal government stands at risk of closing a day or two beyond the December 31 deadline. The House has floated a “continuing resolution” that would fund the government at the previous fiscal year’s levels, but the Senate—controlled by the opposition—has balked, citing disagreements over defense spending and border wall funds.

Crenshaw is quick to point out that the shutdown is not just a bureaucratic hiccup; it is a political weapon that hurts the very people it purports to protect. “When the government shuts down, the agencies that safeguard our nation—defense, intelligence, border enforcement—can’t operate at full capacity,” he says. “That is a national security threat.”

A Veteran’s Lens

Crenshaw’s experience as a Navy SEAL shapes his view of the shutdown’s impact. He recounts how the Department of Defense’s “Defense Logistics Agency” and “Army Sustainment” rely on continuous funding to keep equipment on standby and to maintain readiness for rapid deployment. “My war‑fighters depend on those lines of support,” he notes. “If you put a pause on that, you’re putting the mission and the people who serve at risk.”

He also reflects on his time in the military, where any interruption in supply or training could have immediate, life‑threatening consequences. “In the Navy, there is a culture of trust and dependability,” he adds. “The same principles should apply at the federal level.”

The Border Debate

A central source of the shutdown is the contested funding for the border wall. Crenshaw, a vocal supporter of additional border security measures, acknowledges that his stance has played a role in the impasse. He says he has consistently voted for the funding of a “partial wall” and “enhanced surveillance” along the U.S.–Mexico border. “I am a border‑security conservative,” he says, “but I am not a shutdown advocate. My goal is to protect our nation while ensuring that the government can continue to function.”

The episode references a Houston Public Media article that outlines how the border wall debate has split the House and Senate along party lines. In the interview, Crenshaw acknowledges that bipartisan compromise would require concessions from both sides, including potentially scaling back some border wall ambitions in exchange for a broader fiscal plan.

A Call to Bipartisanship

Crenshaw’s message is clear: “The solution is not to use the shutdown as leverage, but to come together.” He advocates for a “temporary, bipartisan plan” that would fund critical agencies while the House and Senate negotiate the full fiscal year budget. He points to the 2013 and 2019 shutdowns—both of which caused significant economic damage—as cautionary tales.

“I’ve been in Congress long enough to see the toll that a shutdown takes on the American people,” he says. “You have families, small businesses, students, and retirees who rely on federal programs. We owe them a responsible government.”

He also urges constituents to contact their representatives, emphasizing that a robust public voice can influence the political calculus. “Your email, your call, your letter,” he says, “are your power. Use it.”

The Bigger Picture

The Houston Matters show goes beyond the debate, offering context on how a shutdown could ripple through key federal agencies: NASA’s mission planning, the CDC’s public health surveillance, and the IRS’s tax‑processing services. While Crenshaw does not delve into each agency, his comments underscore that a shutdown could derail not only national security but also science, public health, and the economy.

The interview also touches on the broader question of fiscal responsibility. “We can’t keep over‑spending without accountability,” Crenshaw says. “But we also can’t sacrifice the security and stability of the country for political games.”

Bottom Line

In sum, Dan Crenshaw’s take on the federal shutdown reflects a mixture of pragmatic politics and veteran’s urgency. He recognizes the necessity of bipartisan cooperation and the perils of using a shutdown as a bargaining chip. His background as a Navy SEAL informs his insistence that the government must continue to support defense and border agencies without interruption. Meanwhile, he acknowledges that a temporary, bipartisan funding mechanism is the only viable way to keep the government afloat while a full budget is negotiated.

Houston Matters concluded the segment by reminding listeners that the deadline is fast approaching. The episode served as a call to action, urging voters to remember that the fate of the federal budget is not a distant political issue—it is a decision that will affect their everyday lives.

For more details, the article references the full transcript of the Houston Matters episode, a link to the House’s recent budget proposals, and an interview with a former Defense Logistics Agency director—providing listeners a broader view of the shutdown’s potential fallout.