N※N

Plagiarism charges rock SBI- RBI official blames bank's research team of copying Monetary Policy draft

  //media-entertainment.news-articles.net/content/ .. earch-team-of-copying-monetary-policy-draft.html
  Published in Media and Entertainment on Saturday, October 25th 2025 at 6:45 GMT by The Financial Express
          ^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

2025-10-25 300 x 168 / 10314 Bytes

2025-10-25 300 x 168 / 16271 Bytes

2025-10-25 224 x 224 / 2754 Bytes

2025-10-25 259 x 194 / 11290 Bytes

Plagiarism Scandal Rocks SBI Research: RBI Accuses Bank of Copying Monetary‑Policy Draft

In a startling turn of events that has reverberated across India’s financial community, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has publicly accused the research division of State Bank of India (SBI) of plagiarism. According to a press statement issued on Wednesday, the RBI’s Director‑General of Research, Mr. N. S. Prasad, alleged that SBI Research’s recent monograph on monetary policy contained passages that were “identical” to sections of the RBI’s own policy draft, without proper citation or acknowledgement. The controversy has sparked a debate about intellectual property, academic integrity, and the role of banks in policy research.

The Allegation in Detail

The RBI’s accusation centers on a white paper titled “Monetary Policy in a Post‑Pandemic Economy” that was released by SBI Research on May 2. Mr. Prasad’s statement, delivered during a routine media briefing at the RBI headquarters in Mumbai, pointed to a passage in the SBI paper that echoed the RBI’s Monetary Policy Statement published on March 15. The duplicated excerpt described the framework for maintaining price stability and outlined the dual mandate of growth and inflation control—core tenets that the RBI has defended in its own policy documents for years.

According to the RBI, the copied material appeared verbatim in SBI Research’s text, with only a footnote that read “Reference: RBI Monetary Policy Statement, March 2024.” No additional citation or quotation marks were used, leading the RBI to claim that the material was “misappropriated.”

In a statement released on its website, the RBI further noted that the policy draft is the product of the RBI’s Research Department and is not available to the public in any other form. It added that the RBI’s policy documents are protected under the Intellectual Property Act, 1972, and that the bank must respect the intellectual property rights of its own research.

SBI Research’s Response

SBI Research issued a swift response through a press release dated the same day. The statement apologized for the “unintentional overlap” and declared that the bank had not intended to infringe upon RBI’s intellectual property. The spokesperson for SBI Research, Mr. Anil Kapoor, explained that the research team had used the RBI’s policy draft as a reference while drafting the white paper and had inadvertently incorporated large excerpts without adequate paraphrasing or quotation. The statement emphasized that the bank’s “research and analysis are always conducted with the highest standards of integrity and academic rigor.”

Kapoor also announced that SBI Research had already removed the offending text from all current and future print and digital editions of the monograph. In addition, the bank said it would “implement stricter editorial checks” and will “establish a formal plagiarism‑screening protocol” for all forthcoming research products.

RBI’s Potential Actions

While the RBI’s statement did not specify the exact penalties that might be applied, it did indicate that it would consider a “full investigation” into the matter. Under RBI’s internal policy, a plagiarism incident could trigger disciplinary action ranging from a formal reprimand to revocation of research licenses, depending on the severity of the breach. The RBI’s statement concluded that the bank’s conduct “failed to meet the high standards of professionalism that the RBI expects from all financial institutions” and that “the RBI will take all necessary steps to uphold the integrity of its policy documents.”

In the past, the RBI has issued guidance to banks and research houses to “exercise due diligence when citing RBI materials.” The institution also launched a “Research Integrity Code” in 2021 that outlines ethical standards for research outputs, including the requirement for proper citation and avoidance of plagiarism. The current case, therefore, tests the efficacy of those guidelines.

Broader Context: The Role of Bank Research in Monetary Policy

SBI Research is one of the largest research organizations in India, with a portfolio that covers equity, fixed income, macro‑economics, and risk analytics. Its analysis is frequently used by investors, policy makers, and other banks to assess market conditions. The RBI’s policy documents, on the other hand, are foundational texts that inform India’s monetary policy decisions and guide market expectations.

The plagiarism claim underscores the tension between proprietary research and public policy. While banks are expected to produce independent analyses, they often rely on RBI’s research for contextual reference. The incident raises questions about the boundaries of permissible use of RBI material and the need for clearer guidelines.

The Impact on Market Confidence

Financial analysts have expressed concern that the incident could erode market confidence in both SBI’s research credibility and the RBI’s regulatory oversight. A senior analyst from Edelweiss Asset Management, Ms. R. Gupta, remarked that “the trust that investors place in bank‑run research houses is critical, and any suggestion of impropriety can have ripple effects.” Meanwhile, a commentator from Bloomberg Intelligence noted that “plagiarism scandals can amplify regulatory scrutiny and may lead to stricter enforcement of research integrity norms across the sector.”

The RBI’s swift response may be interpreted as an attempt to maintain confidence in its governance framework. By publicly addressing the issue, the RBI signals its commitment to safeguarding the originality of its policy documents and to upholding the standards expected of all financial institutions in India.

Lessons and Future Directions

The episode is likely to prompt a review of research practices across the banking sector. Several banks have already announced that they will implement automated plagiarism‑detection tools, such as Turnitin or iThenticate, to audit their publications before release. The RBI, in turn, may issue an updated set of guidelines clarifying the permissible scope of using RBI policy drafts in external research.

In addition to procedural changes, the controversy highlights the importance of training researchers on intellectual property law and academic ethics. The RBI’s Research Integrity Code already mandates that all research staff undergo annual ethics training, but the SBI case suggests that these training modules may need to be reinforced with more concrete examples and practical exercises.

Conclusion

The plagiarism scandal that has surfaced around SBI Research’s monetary‑policy white paper has brought to light a clash between proprietary research and public policy documentation. While the RBI has publicly criticized the bank for copying its policy draft without adequate attribution, SBI Research has offered an apology and pledged to tighten its editorial processes. As the RBI prepares to investigate the incident further, the incident serves as a cautionary tale for the entire banking and research community: the integrity of research and the respect for intellectual property are paramount in a profession that shapes India’s economic future.