NBA Expansion: Profit Over Product?

  //media-entertainment.news-articles.net/content/2026/02/12/nba-expansion-profit-over-product.html
  Published in Media and Entertainment on Thursday, February 12th 2026 at 16:02 GMT by Total Pro Sports
      Locales: California, Michigan, UNITED STATES

NBA Expansion: Is the League Prioritizing Profit Over Product?

Draymond Green, the outspoken and often controversial power forward for the Golden State Warriors, has thrown a significant wrench into the ongoing conversation surrounding potential NBA expansion. While the league has been openly exploring the possibility of adding franchises - with Seattle and Las Vegas consistently topping the list of likely candidates - Green's recent comments suggest a fundamental disagreement about the why behind the expansion, hinting that financial gain is the driving force, overshadowing concerns about the competitive health of the league.

Speaking on TNT's 'Inside the NBA' on Tuesday, Green didn't mince words. He directly accused the league of prioritizing revenue over the long-term well-being of the NBA's competitive landscape. "I don't know if they're really thinking about what's best for the league," Green stated. "I think they're really thinking about how much money they can make. That's what I think, and that's what I see." This isn't simply a dismissal of expansion; it's a pointed critique of the league's motivations.

Green's concerns aren't unfounded. Expanding the NBA to 32 or even 34 teams would undoubtedly generate substantial income. New media rights deals, increased merchandise sales, and expanded sponsorship opportunities would be lucrative benefits. However, the question remains: at what cost? Adding teams inherently dilutes the talent pool. Every player is a valuable commodity, and stretching those resources across more franchises immediately lowers the overall quality of play.

Green elaborates on this point, questioning the preparedness of existing teams to effectively compete alongside potentially weaker expansion franchises. "We're not really putting in the work to make sure that these teams will be good," he asserted. "That's what I see. We're not really ready for that. So you're adding teams for the sake of adding teams, not because you think they're going to be good or because you think it's going to be better for the league." He implies that the league isn't proactively addressing the challenge of ensuring a competitive balance as it grows.

The history of expansion in other major sports leagues offers cautionary tales. While some expansions have flourished, others have resulted in years of struggling franchises and a noticeable decline in the overall level of competition. The NFL, for example, has seen expansions occasionally result in teams consistently at the bottom of the standings for extended periods. The NBA, already grappling with the challenge of maintaining parity between superteams and rebuilding organizations, risks exacerbating these issues with ill-considered expansion.

Seattle and Las Vegas are undeniably attractive markets. Seattle, in particular, has a passionate fanbase starved for NBA basketball after the Sonics relocated to Oklahoma City in 2008. Las Vegas has proven itself a viable sports market with the success of the Golden Knights (NHL) and the Raiders (NFL). However, simply being a good market isn't enough. The league must demonstrate a concrete plan for building competitive franchises in these cities, something Green clearly believes is lacking.

What would a robust plan look like? It would involve mechanisms beyond simply awarding a franchise and hoping for the best. Potential solutions include expanded draft pick incentives for new teams, salary cap exceptions specifically designed to attract free agents, and perhaps even a temporary protected player list preventing established teams from immediately exploiting the expansion draft. These measures would help level the playing field and ensure that expansion teams aren't immediately relegated to perennial losing seasons.

Green's comments are likely to fuel a larger debate about the future of the NBA. Is the league's primary responsibility to maximize profits for owners, or to provide fans with the highest quality basketball possible? While those two goals aren't necessarily mutually exclusive, Green suggests that the NBA is currently leaning too heavily towards the former. The discussion now turns to whether the league will address these concerns and demonstrate a commitment to maintaining competitive integrity as it contemplates expanding its footprint.