N※N

House Clash Erupts Over CMPA Influence on Bill C-11

  //media-entertainment.news-articles.net/content/ .. ash-erupts-over-cmpa-influence-on-bill-c-11.html
  Published in Media and Entertainment on Friday, February 13th 2026 at 9:12 GMT by Toronto Star
      Locales: Ontario, CANADA

Ottawa, February 13th, 2026 - A heated confrontation in the House of Commons yesterday has ignited a broader debate about the influence of lobbying groups on Canadian media policy, specifically concerning the controversial Bill C-11 and the role of the Canadian Media Producers Association (CMPA). Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez and Conservative MP Rachael Thomas engaged in a sharply worded exchange, culminating in Rodriguez accusing Thomas of outright fabrication during question period.

The immediate trigger for the dispute was Thomas's assertion that the Liberal government is unduly prioritizing the interests of the CMPA - a powerful organization representing large production companies - over those of independent Canadian creators. She alleged that recommendations originating from the CMPA are being directly translated into government policy, effectively silencing the voices of smaller, independent producers who fear being marginalized by the changes.

"The government is making decisions that serve the CMPA, not Canadian creators," Thomas stated, referencing a letter reportedly sent to Rodriguez earlier in the year. She contends this letter provides concrete evidence of the CMPA's influence, outlining specific policy preferences that have subsequently been adopted or are actively being considered by the government.

Rodriguez responded with a forceful denial, vehemently stating, "You're making this up!" He further claimed Thomas was misrepresenting the CMPA's actual position and accused her of spreading misinformation. This direct rebuke, unusual in the often-scripted environment of question period, underscores the high stakes and underlying tensions surrounding the future of Canadian content regulation.

Bill C-11, the Online Streaming Act, has been the focal point of this controversy since its inception. The Liberals champion the legislation as a necessary modernization of the Canadian broadcasting system, designed to ensure continued support for domestic content creation in the age of streaming giants like Netflix, Amazon, and Disney+. The bill aims to level the playing field by requiring these platforms to contribute financially to Canadian content funds and to promote Canadian programming.

However, the bill has faced significant criticism, particularly from within the independent production sector. Opponents argue that the current wording of Bill C-11 heavily favors large, established production companies - precisely those represented by the CMPA. Concerns center around potential requirements for minimum production spending, which smaller independent producers may struggle to meet, effectively barring them from accessing funding and opportunities. Critics fear the legislation will consolidate power within a few major players, leading to a homogenization of Canadian content and a reduction in diversity.

The CMPA maintains that Bill C-11 is crucial for the sustainability of the Canadian production industry as a whole, arguing that it provides a framework for investment and growth in a rapidly changing media landscape. They contend that a strong, competitive industry requires scale, and that larger production companies are better equipped to navigate the complexities of international co-productions and global distribution. The organization has consistently advocated for a modernized regulatory system that recognizes the realities of the digital age.

The CMPA declined to comment specifically on yesterday's exchange, choosing to remain silent amidst the political back-and-forth. However, industry observers note that their extensive lobbying efforts on Bill C-11 are well-documented. Critics suggest that the CMPA's substantial financial resources and established relationships within government circles give them an unfair advantage in shaping media policy.

The clash between Thomas and Rodriguez highlights a growing concern about the influence of special interest groups in Canadian politics. While lobbying is a legitimate part of the democratic process, questions are being raised about the extent to which the interests of powerful organizations are overshadowing the needs of smaller, independent creators and the broader public interest. The debate is expected to continue as Bill C-11 undergoes further scrutiny and potential amendments. The future of Canadian content - and who gets to create it - hangs in the balance.