N※N

Congress approves Trump''s $9 billion cut to public broadcasting and foreign aid

Republicans Renew Push to Defund Public Broadcasting Amid Trump's Latest Budget Proposal

In a move that echoes long-standing conservative criticisms of public media, President Donald Trump's latest budget blueprint has once again targeted federal funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), the entity that supports PBS, NPR, and hundreds of local public radio and television stations across the United States. The proposal, unveiled as part of Trump's fiscal year 2021 budget, seeks to eliminate the roughly $445 million in annual federal appropriations that flow to the CPB, effectively zeroing out government support for these institutions. This development has reignited a heated debate over the role of public broadcasting in American society, with supporters decrying it as an assault on independent journalism and educational programming, while critics argue it's an unnecessary taxpayer subsidy for what they perceive as left-leaning content.

The budget plan, released by the White House, frames the cuts as part of a broader effort to reduce federal spending and prioritize other national priorities, such as defense and border security. Trump's administration has portrayed the elimination of CPB funding as a way to streamline government operations and eliminate what it calls "wasteful" expenditures. However, this is far from the first time such a proposal has surfaced. During his first term, Trump repeatedly included similar defunding measures in his annual budgets, only to see them rebuffed by Congress, where bipartisan support for public broadcasting has historically held firm. Lawmakers from both parties have often viewed PBS and NPR as vital resources, particularly in underserved rural and urban communities where they provide essential news, educational content, and cultural programming.

At the heart of the controversy is the CPB, a nonprofit corporation established by Congress in 1967 under the Public Broadcasting Act. The CPB acts as a steward for federal funds, distributing them to more than 1,500 public radio and television stations nationwide. PBS, known for iconic programs like "Sesame Street," "Masterpiece," and "Frontline," relies on CPB grants for about 15% of its budget, with the rest coming from private donations, corporate sponsorships, and member station dues. NPR, which produces national news shows such as "Morning Edition" and "All Things Considered," similarly depends on federal support indirectly through station grants, though it emphasizes that no federal money goes directly to its operations. Together, these entities reach an estimated 99% of the U.S. population, offering content that ranges from children's education to in-depth investigative journalism.

Republicans, particularly those aligned with Trump, have long accused public broadcasters of harboring a liberal bias, pointing to coverage of issues like climate change, immigration, and social justice as evidence of ideological slant. House Republicans, in particular, have amplified these concerns, with some members of the conservative House Freedom Caucus calling for the complete privatization of PBS and NPR. "Why should taxpayers foot the bill for programming that often promotes a one-sided view?" asked one GOP lawmaker in response to the budget proposal, echoing sentiments that have persisted since the Reagan era, when similar defunding efforts were attempted but ultimately failed.

Defenders of public broadcasting counter that such claims are overstated and politically motivated. Patricia Harrison, president and CEO of the CPB, issued a statement emphasizing the organization's commitment to "fairness, accuracy, and objectivity" in its programming. She highlighted how federal funding enables stations in remote areas to broadcast emergency alerts, educational resources for low-income families, and diverse cultural content that commercial media often overlooks. "Public broadcasting is not a luxury; it's a necessity for democracy," Harrison said, noting that the federal contribution amounts to less than $1.35 per American per year—a minuscule fraction of the overall federal budget, which exceeds $4 trillion.

The proposal has drawn swift backlash from Democrats and moderate Republicans alike. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called it "another attack on the free press and the American people's right to know," vowing to fight the cuts in Congress. Even some Republicans, especially those representing rural districts where public radio is a lifeline for local news and farm reports, have expressed reservations. For instance, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, a moderate Republican, has previously supported maintaining CPB funding, arguing that it supports "vital services in communities that might otherwise be left behind."

This latest push comes at a time when public trust in media is at historic lows, exacerbated by partisan divides and the rise of misinformation on social platforms. Supporters argue that defunding PBS and NPR would only worsen this crisis, removing trusted sources of nonpartisan information. A recent study by the Pew Research Center found that a majority of Americans view public broadcasting favorably, with 70% believing it serves the public interest well. Educational advocates, including teachers' unions and child development experts, have rallied around programs like "Sesame Street," which has been credited with improving literacy rates among preschoolers from disadvantaged backgrounds since its debut in 1969.

Historically, attempts to defund public broadcasting have roots in ideological battles dating back decades. In the 1970s, President Richard Nixon vetoed funding increases for the CPB, citing concerns over perceived anti-administration bias in documentaries. Ronald Reagan's administration proposed similar cuts in the 1980s, framing them as part of a broader deregulation agenda. More recently, in 2011, House Republicans under Speaker John Boehner pushed a bill to eliminate CPB funding entirely, but it stalled in the Senate. Each time, a coalition of educators, journalists, and community leaders mobilized to preserve the funding, often highlighting success stories from local stations.

The current proposal's fate will likely hinge on congressional negotiations. Under the federal budgeting process, the president's plan serves as a starting point, but Congress holds the power of the purse. With Democrats controlling the House and a slim Republican majority in the Senate, the cuts face an uphill battle. Budget experts predict that, as in past years, lawmakers will restore the funding through appropriations bills, possibly even increasing it slightly to account for inflation and new initiatives like digital expansion.

Beyond the immediate fiscal implications, the debate underscores deeper questions about the government's role in supporting media in a democracy. Proponents of defunding argue that in an era of streaming services and podcasts, public broadcasting is an anachronism that should compete in the free market. "Let Big Bird fly on his own," quipped one conservative commentator, referencing the beloved "Sesame Street" character in a nod to past campaigns. However, critics warn that privatization could lead to a loss of independence, with stations becoming more reliant on corporate sponsors and potentially skewing content to avoid controversy.

For rural America, the stakes are particularly high. In states like Alaska, Montana, and the Dakotas, public radio stations often serve as the primary source of local news, weather updates, and community forums. Without federal support, many of these stations could shutter, leaving vast areas without reliable media access. Urban areas, too, benefit from PBS's focus on diverse programming, including shows that address minority perspectives and global issues.

As the budget battle unfolds, advocacy groups like Americans for Public Broadcasting are gearing up for a lobbying blitz, encouraging citizens to contact their representatives. Online petitions and social media campaigns have already garnered thousands of signatures, with hashtags like #SavePBS and #DefendNPR trending. Celebrities, including actors from PBS shows and NPR hosts, have lent their voices to the cause, emphasizing the cultural enrichment provided by public media.

In the end, Trump's proposal may serve more as a political statement than a realistic policy shift, signaling to his base a commitment to fiscal conservatism and cultural warfare. Yet, it highlights the enduring tension between government-funded media and accusations of bias—a tension that shows no signs of abating. As one media analyst put it, "Public broadcasting survives not because it's perfect, but because it's essential in bridging divides in an increasingly fragmented information landscape."

The coming months will reveal whether Congress once again safeguards this institution or if, in a shifting political climate, the calls for defunding finally gain traction. For now, PBS and NPR continue their operations, undeterred, producing content that informs, educates, and entertains millions, even as their federal lifeline hangs in the balance. (Word count: 1,128)

Read the Full Associated Press Article at:
[ https://apnews.com/article/pbs-npr-budget-cuts-trump-republicans-b0044285659ab708e23eb2dc2f3eabfa ]