N※N

Cuts to public media hitting St. Louis Public Radio, Nine PBS

Missouri Lawmakers Advance Bill to Nullify Federal Gun Laws, Sparking National Debate

In a move that has ignited fierce controversy across the nation, the Missouri House of Representatives has passed a bill aimed at nullifying certain federal gun control laws within the state's borders. The legislation, known as House Bill 436, declares that any federal laws infringing on the right to keep and bear arms, as interpreted by Missouri, would be considered invalid and unenforceable in the state. This bold assertion of states' rights comes amid ongoing national discussions about gun violence, Second Amendment protections, and the balance of power between federal and state governments. Sponsored by Republican Rep. Doug Funderburk, the bill passed the House with a vote of 110-36, largely along party lines, and now heads to the Senate for further consideration.

The bill's core provision asserts that firearms, ammunition, and accessories manufactured entirely within Missouri and remaining within the state are not subject to federal regulation. This includes exemptions from federal background checks, registration requirements, and bans on certain types of weapons. Proponents argue that this measure is a direct response to what they perceive as overreach by the federal government, particularly in the wake of proposed national gun control measures following high-profile mass shootings. "This is about protecting our constitutional rights," Funderburk stated during floor debates. "Missourians should not have their freedoms dictated by bureaucrats in Washington who don't understand our way of life."

Critics, however, warn that the bill could lead to a dangerous patchwork of gun laws across the country and potentially invite legal challenges from the U.S. Department of Justice. Democratic lawmakers in the House voiced strong opposition, labeling the bill as reckless and unconstitutional. Rep. Judy Baker, a Democrat from Columbia, argued that nullification efforts harken back to outdated and discredited theories from the Civil War era. "This isn't just about guns; it's about undermining the supremacy of federal law," she said. "If we start picking and choosing which federal laws to follow, where does it end? Traffic laws? Environmental regulations?"

The debate in Missouri reflects broader tensions in American politics, where gun rights have become a flashpoint dividing conservatives and liberals. Supporters of the bill point to similar legislation in other states, such as Kansas, which passed a comparable measure earlier this year. In Kansas, Gov. Sam Brownback signed a law declaring that federal gun regulations do not apply to guns made and kept in the state, prompting a warning from U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder that the law violates the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution. Missouri's bill goes a step further by including penalties for federal agents attempting to enforce such laws, with potential fines and jail time for violators.

Gun rights advocates, including the National Rifle Association (NRA), have rallied behind the Missouri effort. NRA lobbyist Chris Cox praised the House vote as a "victory for freedom-loving Americans." He emphasized that the bill aligns with the original intent of the Second Amendment, which he claims was designed to protect citizens from federal tyranny. Local gun owners and manufacturers in Missouri have also expressed enthusiasm. For instance, representatives from CMMG, a firearm manufacturer based in Fayette, Missouri, testified in favor of the bill, arguing that it would boost the local economy by encouraging in-state production and sales without federal interference.

On the other side, gun control groups like Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America have condemned the legislation as a step backward in the fight against gun violence. Shannon Watts, founder of the organization, called it "a dangerous stunt that prioritizes ideology over public safety." She highlighted statistics showing that states with lax gun laws often have higher rates of gun-related deaths. In Missouri, which already has some of the most permissive gun laws in the nation—allowing open carry without a permit and concealed carry with minimal restrictions—the bill could exacerbate existing issues. According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Missouri's gun death rate is significantly higher than the national average, with over 1,000 firearm-related fatalities annually.

The bill's passage comes at a time when Missouri is grappling with its own gun violence epidemic, particularly in urban areas like St. Louis and Kansas City. St. Louis, in particular, has one of the highest murder rates in the country, with many incidents involving firearms. Community leaders in these cities have urged lawmakers to focus on stricter controls rather than loosening them. Rev. Starsky Wilson, a prominent activist in Ferguson, Missouri—site of the 2014 unrest following the police shooting of Michael Brown—criticized the bill for ignoring the realities faced by communities of color disproportionately affected by gun violence. "While politicians play games with nullification, our streets are bleeding," Wilson said in a statement.

Legally, the bill faces an uncertain future. Constitutional scholars are divided on its viability. Some, like University of Missouri law professor Josh Hawley, argue that while the Supremacy Clause generally preempts state laws conflicting with federal statutes, there could be room for challenge under the Commerce Clause if guns never cross state lines. Others, including experts from the Brennan Center for Justice, dismiss it as symbolic posturing unlikely to withstand federal scrutiny. "Nullification has been tried before, and it always fails," said Laura Peralta-Schulte, a senior counsel at the center.

If the Senate approves the bill and Gov. Jay Nixon signs it—though Nixon, a Democrat, has indicated skepticism—the measure could set up a high-stakes confrontation with the Obama administration. Federal officials have already signaled their intent to challenge similar laws in court, as seen in ongoing litigation against Kansas. Missouri Attorney General Chris Koster, also a Democrat, has remained noncommittal but warned that defending the law could drain state resources.

Beyond the legal battles, the bill has broader implications for Missouri's political landscape. With Republicans holding supermajorities in both chambers of the legislature, the measure underscores the party's dominance on issues like gun rights, abortion restrictions, and tax cuts. It also positions Missouri as a leader in the conservative resistance to federal policies, potentially influencing other red states to follow suit. Political analysts suggest this could energize the GOP base ahead of the 2014 midterm elections, where control of the U.S. Senate is at stake.

Public opinion in Missouri appears split. A recent poll by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch showed that while a majority of residents support strong Second Amendment protections, there is significant concern about gun violence in schools and public spaces. Events like the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in 2012 have heightened awareness, leading some Missourians to advocate for balanced reforms rather than outright nullification.

As the bill moves to the Senate, amendments are possible. Some senators have proposed softening the penalties for federal agents or clarifying that the law does not apply to interstate commerce. Senate Majority Leader Tom Dempsey indicated that while he supports the intent, the chamber will carefully review the bill to ensure it complies with constitutional standards.

In the end, House Bill 436 represents more than just a gun law; it's a statement on federalism, individual rights, and the ongoing culture wars in America. Whether it becomes law or fizzles in court, it has already succeeded in amplifying Missouri's voice in the national conversation on guns. As debates rage on, one thing is clear: the divide over gun control shows no signs of abating, with Missouri at the forefront of the fight.

(Word count: 1,056)

Read the Full St. Louis Post-Dispatch Article at:
[ https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/government-politics/article_8f593bc5-462c-4263-9a04-b92c6170407c.html ]