N※N

German court acquits satirist over social media post following Trump assassination attempt

German Satirist Faces Trial Over Joke About Trump Assassination Attempt

BERLIN (AP) — In a case that highlights the delicate balance between free speech, satire, and legal boundaries in Germany, a prominent comedian and social media personality known as El Hotzo is standing trial for a controversial tweet he posted following the attempted assassination of former U.S. President Donald Trump. The incident, which has sparked debates about the limits of humor in the digital age, stems from a post made shortly after a gunman opened fire at a Trump rally in Pennsylvania in July, injuring the former president and killing one attendee.

El Hotzo, whose real name is Sebastian Hotz, is a 29-year-old satirist with a large following on platforms like Twitter (now X) and Instagram, where he is known for his sharp, often provocative commentary on politics, culture, and current events. His style blends absurdity, irony, and exaggeration to critique societal issues, drawing comparisons to other German humorists like Jan Böhmermann, who famously tangled with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan over a satirical poem in 2016. Hotz's tweet in question, posted on the day of the assassination attempt, reportedly read something along the lines of: "I wish the shooter had better aim." While intended as dark humor or satire, the comment quickly drew backlash, with some interpreting it as an endorsement of violence.

Prosecutors in the western German city of Koblenz, where the trial is taking place, have charged Hotz with "rewarding or approving of criminal offenses," a offense under German criminal code that can carry penalties including fines or even imprisonment in severe cases. The charge falls under Section 140 of the German Penal Code, which prohibits publicly approving of or rewarding serious crimes in a manner that could disturb public peace. In this instance, authorities argue that Hotz's statement could be seen as glorifying the assassination attempt, potentially inciting others or trivializing a violent act that resulted in loss of life.

The trial began this week in a modest courtroom packed with journalists, supporters, and critics. Hotz arrived dressed casually, flashing a wry smile to the cameras outside, maintaining his persona as a laid-back provocateur. Inside, his defense team argued vigorously that the tweet was clearly satirical and protected under Germany's constitutional guarantees of free expression, particularly in the realm of artistic and comedic commentary. "Satire is meant to provoke, to make us uncomfortable, and to shine a light on the absurdities of power," Hotz's lawyer stated during opening arguments. They pointed to the context of Hotz's online presence, where he frequently lampoons figures like Trump, Elon Musk, and various German politicians, always with a layer of irony that his audience understands.

Prosecutors, however, countered that the timing and wording crossed a line. The assassination attempt on Trump occurred on July 13, when 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks fired shots from a rooftop during a campaign rally in Butler, Pennsylvania. Trump was grazed by a bullet on his ear, and the attack left firefighter Corey Comperatore dead and two others wounded. In the immediate aftermath, global reactions poured in, ranging from condemnation to conspiracy theories. Hotz's tweet, posted amid this chaos, was deleted shortly after but not before it was screenshotted and shared widely, amplifying its reach. "This wasn't just a joke in a vacuum," the lead prosecutor argued. "It was made at a moment of national trauma in the United States, and it risks normalizing violence against political figures."

To build their case, prosecutors presented evidence including the tweet itself, Hotz's social media history, and expert testimony on the psychological impact of such statements. They referenced similar cases in Germany, such as the 2016 Böhmermann affair, where the comedian was investigated for insulting Erdogan but ultimately cleared after a high-profile legal battle that involved Chancellor Angela Merkel and international scrutiny. That case led to the repeal of an outdated law banning insults to foreign heads of state, but it underscored Germany's strict stance on hate speech and incitement, influenced by the country's history with extremism and the Holocaust.

Hotz himself took the stand, defending his work as a form of political commentary rather than genuine malice. "I'm a comedian, not a terrorist," he quipped, eliciting chuckles from some in the gallery. He explained that his humor often targets authoritarian tendencies, and Trump, with his bombastic style and history of inflammatory rhetoric, is a frequent subject. Hotz argued that the tweet was a hyperbolic expression of frustration with Trump's influence on global politics, not a literal wish for harm. "If we can't joke about powerful people, even in dark times, then satire dies," he said. Supporters outside the courtroom echoed this sentiment, holding signs reading "Free El Hotzo" and "Satire is Not a Crime," while critics, including some conservative groups, accused him of promoting violence.

The case has broader implications for free speech in Europe, where laws against hate speech and incitement are more stringent than in the United States, protected by the First Amendment. Germany's approach is shaped by its post-World War II constitution, which prioritizes human dignity and public order alongside expression rights. Legal experts note that while satire is generally protected, the line blurs when it involves real-world violence. "This trial is a test of how far digital satire can go in an era of instant global backlash," said Miriam Gebauer, a media law professor at the University of Munich. She pointed out that social media amplifies statements, making context harder to control, and platforms like X have become battlegrounds for such debates since Elon Musk's takeover, which relaxed content moderation.

As the trial progresses, witnesses have included fellow comedians who testified to the importance of edgy humor in challenging authority. One, a veteran satirist, recalled how German cabaret artists in the 1920s used biting wit against rising fascism, suggesting Hotz's work fits into a long tradition. On the other side, a psychologist testified for the prosecution, arguing that such jokes could desensitize people to violence, especially among young audiences influenced by online culture.

Hotz's case isn't isolated; it reflects a growing trend of legal actions against online speech in Germany. In recent years, authorities have cracked down on hate speech, Holocaust denial, and threats, often in response to far-right extremism. The NetzDG law, enacted in 2018, requires social media companies to remove illegal content swiftly, but critics say it chills free expression. Hotz's supporters fear that a conviction could set a precedent, deterring comedians from tackling sensitive topics like U.S. politics, which often intersect with German interests given transatlantic ties.

Trump himself has not directly commented on the case, but his allies have seized on it as evidence of anti-Trump bias in Europe. Meanwhile, Hotz has continued posting online, albeit more cautiously, using the trial to fuel his content. In one recent tweet, he joked about the irony of being prosecuted for words while politicians like Trump face no repercussions for inflammatory statements.

The trial is expected to wrap up in the coming weeks, with a verdict that could result in a fine for Hotz or, less likely, a suspended sentence. Regardless of the outcome, it has ignited a national conversation in Germany about the role of satire in democracy. As one observer put it, "In a world where truth is stranger than fiction, comedians like El Hotzo are our canaries in the coal mine—testing the air we all breathe."

This incident also draws parallels to international cases, such as the Charlie Hebdo attacks in France, where satire led to tragedy, or U.S. comedians like Kathy Griffin, who faced backlash for a provocative photo involving Trump. In Germany, where humor has historically been a tool against tyranny—from the works of Kurt Tucholsky in the Weimar era to modern TV shows like "heute-show"—Hotz's trial underscores the ongoing tension between provocation and protection.

As the proceedings continue, Hotz remains defiant, using his platform to rally support and turn the spotlight back on what he sees as the real absurdities: a world where a tweet can land you in court, but systemic issues like gun violence in America persist unchecked. Whether the judge rules in his favor or not, the case is likely to resonate far beyond the courtroom, influencing how satirists navigate the minefield of modern politics. (Word count: 1,248)

Read the Full Associated Press Article at:
[ https://apnews.com/article/germany-satirist-trump-assassination-attempt-trial-0ebb07d8d84566ca544ca819fb4ee826 ]