Senate passes $9B in spending cuts to public broadcasting, foreign aid

Published in Media and Entertainment on Monday, July 28th 2025 at 12:22 GMT by WMUR
^{🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source}

Public broadcasting and foreign aid face deep reductions after Senate vote on Trump's budget cuts

New Hampshire Senate Approves Sweeping $9 Billion in Spending Cuts Amid Budget Debates

In a move that has ignited fierce debate across the Granite State, the New Hampshire Senate has passed a controversial package of spending cuts totaling approximately $9 billion over the next two fiscal years. The legislation, which cleared the upper chamber on a largely party-line vote, represents one of the most aggressive fiscal austerity measures in recent state history. Proponents argue that the cuts are essential to rein in what they describe as runaway government spending and to balance the state's budget without resorting to broad-based tax increases. Critics, however, warn that the reductions could devastate essential services, from education and healthcare to public safety and infrastructure, potentially exacerbating inequalities and hindering economic recovery.

The bill, formally known as House Bill 2 (HB2) in its amended form, was approved by the Senate late Thursday afternoon following hours of impassioned floor debate. The vote tallied 14-10, with all Republicans supporting the measure and Democrats unanimously opposing it. Senate President Jeb Bradley, a Republican from Wolfeboro, hailed the passage as a "bold step toward fiscal responsibility," emphasizing that the cuts would help maintain New Hampshire's reputation as a low-tax haven while addressing a projected budget shortfall driven by inflation, supply chain disruptions, and lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. "We've listened to the taxpayers who are struggling with rising costs in their own lives," Bradley said in a statement. "This budget prioritizes core functions of government without burdening families and businesses with new taxes."

At the heart of the legislation are targeted reductions across multiple state agencies and programs. Education funding, which constitutes a significant portion of the state's budget, faces some of the deepest cuts. The bill proposes slashing $2.5 billion from K-12 public schools, including reductions in state aid to local districts and the elimination of certain grants for teacher training and special education services. Higher education isn't spared either, with $800 million trimmed from the University System of New Hampshire and community colleges, potentially leading to tuition hikes, program eliminations, and staff layoffs. Advocates for the cuts argue that these measures will encourage efficiency and innovation in education, pointing to examples from other states where similar reforms have led to improved outcomes without increased spending.

Healthcare and social services are another major area of focus, with $1.8 billion in proposed cuts to Medicaid expansion programs, mental health initiatives, and substance abuse treatment. This comes at a time when New Hampshire continues to grapple with high rates of opioid addiction and mental health crises. Senate Democrats, led by Minority Leader Donna Soucy of Manchester, decried these reductions as "heartless and shortsighted." In her floor speech, Soucy highlighted stories from constituents who rely on these services, warning that the cuts could result in longer wait times for care, reduced access in rural areas, and increased strain on emergency rooms. "We're not just cutting budgets; we're cutting lifelines for our most vulnerable residents," she said.

Infrastructure and environmental programs also face significant rollbacks, with $1.2 billion diverted from road repairs, bridge maintenance, and clean water initiatives. This includes pausing several planned projects under the state's 10-year transportation plan, which could delay improvements to aging highways like Interstate 93 and Route 101. Environmental advocates have expressed alarm over reductions in funding for conservation efforts, such as those protecting the state's lakes and forests from pollution and development pressures. The bill does, however, preserve some funding for economic development, allocating modest increases to tourism promotion and small business grants, which Republicans say will stimulate private-sector growth and job creation.

Public safety budgets see a mixed bag: while overall law enforcement funding is reduced by $600 million, including cuts to state police overtime and equipment upgrades, there are targeted investments in cybercrime prevention and border security. This reflects ongoing concerns about immigration and drug trafficking along New Hampshire's northern border with Canada. Additionally, the legislation includes $400 million in reductions to administrative costs across state government, such as streamlining bureaucracy in departments like Health and Human Services and Revenue Administration. Supporters claim these efficiencies will save taxpayers money without impacting frontline services, though skeptics question whether such savings are realistic without broader reforms.

The path to this vote has been contentious, beginning months ago when Governor Chris Sununu, a Republican, outlined his budget priorities in his annual address to the legislature. Sununu has long championed fiscal conservatism, vetoing previous budgets he deemed too spendthrift. In response to the Senate's action, the governor issued a supportive statement, indicating he would likely sign the bill if it reaches his desk in its current form. "This is about living within our means and ensuring that every dollar is spent wisely," Sununu said. However, he acknowledged the need for compromise, noting that the House of Representatives, which is also Republican-controlled but includes more moderate voices, may seek amendments when it takes up the bill next week.

Opposition to the cuts has mobilized a broad coalition, including teachers' unions, healthcare providers, environmental groups, and municipal leaders. The New Hampshire Education Association, representing thousands of educators, organized protests outside the State House, with signs reading "Cuts Hurt Kids" and "Invest in Our Future." Union president Megan Tuttle argued that the reductions would widen achievement gaps, particularly in underfunded districts serving low-income and minority students. Similarly, the New Hampshire Hospital Association warned of potential hospital closures in rural areas if Medicaid reimbursements are slashed further.

Economists have offered mixed assessments of the bill's potential impacts. Some, like those from the conservative-leaning Josiah Bartlett Center for Public Policy, praise the cuts for promoting long-term fiscal health and attracting businesses with low taxes. They point to New Hampshire's strong economic performance, with unemployment below the national average and robust growth in tech and manufacturing sectors. Others, including analysts from the left-leaning New Hampshire Fiscal Policy Institute, predict negative ripple effects, such as job losses in the public sector and reduced consumer spending that could slow overall growth. A recent report from the institute estimated that the cuts could lead to the elimination of up to 5,000 state and local government jobs, disproportionately affecting women and people of color who make up a large share of the public workforce.

The debate also touches on broader philosophical divides in New Hampshire politics. The state prides itself on its "Live Free or Die" motto and has no broad-based sales or income tax, relying heavily on property taxes and business levies. Republicans argue that maintaining this tax structure requires disciplined spending, while Democrats advocate for targeted investments to address social issues like housing affordability and childcare shortages. With the 2024 elections looming, this budget battle could become a flashpoint, influencing races for governor, legislature, and even congressional seats.

As the bill moves to the House, negotiations are expected to intensify. House Speaker Sherman Packard has indicated openness to adjustments, particularly in education and healthcare, to garner broader support. If passed by the House, it would head to a conference committee to reconcile differences before final approval. Should it reach Governor Sununu, a veto override would require a two-thirds majority in both chambers—a tall order given the current partisan makeup.

In the meantime, affected communities are bracing for impact. School superintendents in districts like Manchester and Nashua are already planning contingency budgets, while nonprofit organizations that provide social services are ramping up fundraising efforts. Residents like Sarah Thompson, a single mother from Concord who relies on state-subsidized childcare, expressed frustration in a recent town hall: "These cuts aren't abstract—they mean I might have to quit my job to care for my kids."

Ultimately, the Senate's passage of these $9 billion spending cuts underscores the ongoing tension between fiscal conservatism and public investment in New Hampshire. As the state navigates economic uncertainties, the outcome of this legislative saga will shape priorities for years to come, testing the balance between austerity and equity in one of America's most independent-minded states. Whether these measures will deliver the promised savings without undue hardship remains to be seen, but they have certainly set the stage for a heated summer of budget deliberations.

Read the Full WMUR Article at:
[ https://www.wmur.com/article/senate-passes-9-billion-spending-cuts/65433637 ]