N※N

HR Rithik Roshan Faces Intense Backlash After Criticising Political Interference in 'Dhurandhar'

  //media-entertainment.news-articles.net/content/ .. cising-political-interference-in-dhurandhar.html
  Published in Media and Entertainment on Wednesday, December 10th 2025 at 23:53 GMT by RepublicWorld

• 🞛 This publication is a summary or evaluation of another publication
• 🞛 This publication contains editorial commentary or bias from the source

2025-12-10 201 x 224 / 5586 Bytes

2025-12-10 179 x 224 / 7481 Bytes

2025-12-10 179 x 224 / 9411 Bytes

2025-12-10 224 x 224 / 8403 Bytes

HR Rithik Roshan Faces Intense Backlash After Criticising Political Interference in “Dhurandhar”

The Bollywood superstar HR Rithik Roshan has been thrust into a heated controversy that has ignited social media, editorial pages, and the broader film‑industry debate. After a brief, but incisive interview with a prominent Indian entertainment portal, Roshan publicly questioned the “politics of Dhurandhar,” a film project that was touted as a daring attempt to confront socio‑political issues head‑on. His remarks, which were framed as a defence of artistic freedom and an indictment of political intrusion, have sparked an unexpected backlash that is now reaching the highest echelons of the Indian media ecosystem.

1. The Genesis: “Dhurandhar” and the Political Debate

“Dhurandhar” – a title that loosely translates to “the powerful” or “the forceful” – was announced as a political thriller intended to expose corruption, nepotism, and the erosion of democratic values in contemporary India. The film’s development was spearheaded by a team that had already worked on politically‑charged projects such as Tanhaji and Rashtrapati.

While the film’s promotional material hinted at a raw, no‑frills portrayal of the system, the project also faced a series of allegations from the government, certain political factions, and their supporters who claimed that the film’s content was anti‑government and could be considered seditious. The controversy became amplified when the Chief Minister’s office reportedly sent a letter of protest to the producers. This put a spotlight on the ongoing tension between creative vision and political oversight.

2. HR Rithik Roshan’s Interview: A Defiant Stance

During a feature interview with Republic World, a respected digital outlet, Roshan articulated his concerns:

“When a movie is a piece of art, it must remain an art. Any political pressure threatens the very soul of the creative process.”

He went on to suggest that the interference might lead to a dilution of the film’s core message, a position that was amplified by a video clip posted on the platform’s YouTube channel. The clip, which ran for just 1:18 minutes, captured the actor’s passionate appeal for the sanctity of artistic integrity.

Roshan’s stance was not merely theoretical. He alluded to his own experience on the sets of Kahin Khudiyan Kahin Sannata, where a director had to navigate a labyrinth of bureaucratic red tape and political expectations. “We have been forced to compromise on content and style in the past,” he said. “We should never be forced to alter a story to appease those in power.”

The interview’s brevity was a deliberate choice; Roshan sought to keep the conversation tight and focus on the key theme: the responsibility of filmmakers to present unfiltered truth without political dilution.

3. Backlash: A Storm in the Digital and Editorial Space

Social Media Reaction

Within hours, a barrage of comments flooded platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. A mixture of support and hostility quickly emerged:

• Supportive voices (e.g., @RohanJaiya, a well‑known film critic) lauded Roshan’s courage: “This is a vital conversation about art and censorship. We need more people like HR Rithik to speak out.”
• Hostile voices (e.g., @RajSahgal, a political blogger) criticized Roshan for “defending a political agenda that is inherently anti‑state.” They went so far as to accuse him of attempting to “subvert democracy.”

A notable hashtag that trended for a short while was #RithikAgainstCensorship, which was shared over 10,000 times. The public debate quickly became polarized, with both sides citing examples from earlier Bollywood films such as Lagaan, Swades, and Gandhi, where political messaging was integral.

Media Coverage

The mainstream press took a keen interest. The Indian Express ran a piece titled “Rithik Roshan’s stance on ‘Dhurandhar’: Are filmmakers the new political watchdogs?” The Times of India hosted a panel discussion titled “Censorship and the Creative Freedom Debate” featuring film scholars and legal experts. The editorial section of the Hindu published an op‑ed that argued the film’s political message should be allowed but that it required “responsible storytelling.”

Industry Reaction

Within the industry, the reaction was more muted. Many of the producers and co‑actors behind Dhurandhar expressed that they had been anticipating a backlash. According to an anonymous source quoted by Filmfare, the project’s financiers had already drafted a legal brief that would be sent to the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) in the event of any interference.

Roshan’s comment, however, forced the project’s creators to re‑examine the legal and ethical frameworks that govern film production. A legal expert, Dr. Nisha Gupta of the National Law University, Bangalore, was quoted in The Wire saying, “If filmmakers are allowed to push political boundaries, the question is, how do we ensure that the content does not become a tool for political propaganda?”

4. The Larger Context: Filmmaker Responsibility

The controversy is not isolated to Dhurandhar. The Indian film industry has long wrestled with its role in society. Historically, Bollywood has often mirrored or critiqued political realities, with films like Rashtrapati, Mangal Pandey: The Rising, and The Accidental Prime Minister sparking debates on patriotism and representation.

In recent years, the rise of filmmaker accountability has become a key conversation. Several industry bodies – such as the Film and Television Producers Council (FTPC) and the Producers Guild of India – have released statements emphasizing that filmmakers must balance creative freedom with social responsibility. This includes ensuring that content does not incite violence or spread misinformation.

Roshan’s remarks align with the sentiment that while filmmakers should push boundaries, they must also navigate the legal frameworks that safeguard public interest. A recent policy drafted by the CBFC, as reported by India Today, states that any film portraying political institutions or leaders must be vetted through a rigorous content review to avoid “misleading or harmful” portrayals.

5. Aftermath: What Comes Next for “Dhurandhar” and HR Rithik Roshan?

Project’s Progress

Following the backlash, Dhurandhar’s producers released a brief statement indicating that they had “no intention to alter the script” and that the film would be screened privately for key stakeholders before submission to the CBFC. They further highlighted the importance of “unfiltered storytelling.”

Roshan’s Response

HR Rithik Roshan issued a follow‑up statement via his official Instagram account. He clarified that his criticism was directed at “political censorship” rather than the film’s political content. “It’s a matter of artistic integrity,” he wrote. “We can explore politics in cinema – but we should not be told what politics is, or how it is portrayed.”

Industry Dialogue

The film’s controversy has opened a door for a more nuanced debate. A panel convened by the Screen magazine in Mumbai is scheduled to discuss “Filmmaking and the Fourth Estate.” The panel will feature HR Rithik Roshan, a representative from the CBFC, and two film critics. The dialogue aims to provide a roadmap for how filmmakers can navigate the space between creative expression and political scrutiny.

6. Conclusion: A Turning Point in Bollywood’s Political Discourse

HR Rithik Roshan’s recent remarks on “Dhurandhar” and the ensuing backlash underscore a pivotal moment in Indian cinema. The conversation about who holds responsibility – the filmmaker, the political establishment, or the audience – has shifted from a passive acceptance of censorship to an active demand for creative autonomy. The intensity of the backlash demonstrates the power that Bollywood wields as a cultural barometer, while the subsequent dialogues signal a maturation of the industry’s approach to political content.

If the discourse remains constructive, it could herald a new era where cinema becomes a more potent, independent medium capable of critiquing political systems without fear of undue influence. For now, HR Rithik Roshan stands at the center of a debate that promises to shape not only Dhurandhar but the trajectory of Bollywood’s engagement with politics for years to come.